Tariku's Droplets: September 2013

Monday, September 16, 2013

‘Absurdistan’ (a.k.a Ethiopia) I

The Democratic Republic of ‘Absurdistan’

...Tariku Abas-Etenesh...

My closest friends call me Tare; that is my nickname. And I sometimes amuse myself with the question,”if countries could take official nicknames, what would the nickname for Ethiopia be? Recently, while I was reading an Adam Johnson article about the late North Korean ‘Dear’ Leader Kim Jong Il, I came across a word that could fit Ethiopia as it fits North Korea for different reasons:‘Absurdistan.’

So let's talk about The Federal Democratic Republic of Absurdistan ( a.k.a Ethiopia) where many absurdities are accepted norms.

In the republic of Absurdistan: Telecommunication, TV, radio, and other means of communication were introduced almost as immediately as they were invented; however their state of affairs now is almost as backward as they were when they came here in the old times. Some 'good citizens' of Absurdistan, however,claim that if people could be granted the right to buy cell phones it is a great development and change in the right direction even though the service is not better than the old switchboard Tele service, and that no official ever takes responsibility. In Absurdistan, Television service has three channels all presenting the same programs. Some 'good citizens' of Absurdistan ,however,claim the fact that the republic has a TV station is enough by itself.

In the republic of Absurdistan: Honoring great deeds of great men is a rarest of treats while decrying and belittling are the normal function of life. If a country's history is to be gauged by the number of statues erected to honor great personalities of the republic, Absurdistan would look like a 15 years old. If anyone is honored in Absurdistan, it is usually because he/she was a person who dared to stand alone and bear the burden of living for his /her vision not because there is enabling systems in place. When the 'good citizens' of Absurdistan do honor someone, especially with a Political power, they do so by turning him/her in to a 'god-like’ creature of an actual little deity.

In the republic of Absurdistan: Political leaders demand embellishments for doing the simplest thing on earth: doing their own job. They call for mass demonstrations to celebrate themselves because they appeared on time to their office; they demand sainthood vested upon them for every kilometer of road whose construction they supervised and whose financing was done by the tax payers of the public; they also demand the public to sing for them because they gave service at a public office financed by the taxpayers' money; they demand worship for paying the government employee their own deserved salary. If they build a bridge, it is as if a great unheard of miracle has happened on earth. They also require the public to surrender its right to ask, right to speak, and right to think for the mere reason that they have rebuilt a city. The 'good citizens' of Absurdistan, believe that such is an unheard of great feat deserving the surrender of all inalienable rights of citizens.

In the republic of Absurdistan: Political power is a factor of macho- philosophy where any group with the better collection of guns comes to power and feigns to have got the power through the legitimate lanes of democratic elections. Though the story of the republic of Absurdistan in the past century indicates only power of the gun dictating the political will, the 'good citizens' of Absurdistan want to believe that the voice of the citizen was always the catalyst in accession to political power. And the 'good citizens' tell you so while displaying their common characters: the fear of everything including their family members, uncertainty of and parroting what the politicians claim as absolute truth.

In the republic of Absurdistan: One has to first be identified as member of an ethnic group to be identified as a citizen; and if one does not fit to any one category or does not want to be identified so, no option is on the table of the 'great democracy of Absurdistan'. But some 'good citizens' of Absurdistan claim this is the best thing a democratic system could offer in the 21st century.

In the republic of Absurdistan: The people have three options when it comes to their reactions towards their political leaders: Fear, More Fear and Extreme dread. And the leaders go from being feared to more feared and to the most feared. But some 'good citizens' of Absurdistan claim all fears the leader of the time is imposing on the country is a bit less than the former leaders of the country; and so should be a great reason for jubilation.

In the republic of Absurdistan: everything otherwise regarded as absurd in other places is accepted norm. The same politician who believes that " the people" under his rule,‘do not need more than one party’; and discourages any dissent, feels confident enough to preach that democratic pluralism is a great thing at the same time.

In the republic of Absurdistan: The definition of corruption is not embezzling public finances and breaking Public trust. The 'Absudrdistan' definition of corruption is speaking up about corruption among public officials. Officials can become as corrupt as they would love to become, and still be invisible to the " democratic system of the Absurdistan's government'; yet the visibility of the corrupt nature of the public officials come apparent only when they oppose the government of Absurdistan.

In the republic of Absurdistan: the leaders have library full of books. However, the books they have packed in their libraries are only two: Book one: The 'Democratic' practices of Machiavelli’s ideals; Book two: The democratic implementations of 'Animal Farm' .

If after reading the above lines you thought 'this is absurd', I could only say “welcome to the Federal Democratic Republic of Absurdistan, I mean -Ethiopia.

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Reframing ‘The African Renaissance’

By Tariku Abas-Etenesh

(First appeared on: The EthiopianAmerican:( http://www.theethiopianamerican.com/index.php)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Africa rising?

Since May 2013, boldfaced and prominent big billboards greet passersby in Addis Ababa reading: Arise Africa. It is arguably the most frequently heard avowal during the recently celebrated golden Jubilee of the African Union (AU), under the theme: Pan-Africanism and African renaissance.

The theme’s comfortingly deserved meaning is attributed to the current economic development, according to IMF data, in various African countries including Ethiopia. What a positive spirit to celebrate the anniversary with! As a Nigerian proverb says it, when a man says yes, his Chi (his personal god) says yes; and so, when a continent says I am rising, the spirits of her citizens rise up with it.

Despite the sense of positivism and audacity the slogan entails, however, I believe it is high time for us, Africans, to deliberate with caution not only the realities that gave ‘Africa rising’ its meaningful context, but also the direction Africa is rising. And allow me one more question, is Africa claiming ‘to be rising’ because it is so, or it is claiming so, because the West declared it? Anyone who knows about the great infrastructure developments and recent discoveries of precious minerals and fossil oil that changed the economic trajectory of a number of African countries might assume the question is ill constructed or playing evasive of the facts on the ground. Well, this is not my intention. Denying the facts would be a self debasing attempt and condescending to AU. Rather, mine is an honest worry that our continent should be insisting on framing its renaissance on a grassroots Pan-African drives in order to avoid repeating the mistakes of the 1960’s.

Do not look where you fell, but where you slipped

The world is in recession and the corollary challenges are spewing in forms of revolutions against governments, tensions between religions, and xenophobic tendencies against the scapegoat “others” almost everywhere in the world.

Against such backdrops, the rise that is being positively pronounced about Africa could also be regarded as a caution call for the continent. Why? For the obvious and same reason that the liberation movements of the 1960’s were thwarted into not completing the liberation project and ended up being nominal political freedoms. And the dream for economic liberation was stalled by nightmares of mishandled euphoria that gave way for the former colonial masters to hijack the much needed stability and prosperity and turn the continent into hotbeds of coups. Africa was not cautious enough in handling the liberation project with discipline, as a result of which neo-colonial trends became norm as an African proverb puts it ‘when a cock is drunk, he forgets the hawk.’

The year of Africa - the 1960 – was not only a time when Africa woke up free, against all odds, into a hostile world that was not willing to allow the continent enough time to gather her breath. A polarized world that was caught up in the cold war engulfed the continent to not only take sides but also disorient the fragile freedom it just had won. The scares of the cold war coupled with conflict ridden economies, the continent has spent a good part of the past half century wasting indebted to the West and in some terms still paying the price through the malignant dependence on aid.

Now after half a century, Africa is set on another proud stride; yet it does so into a world reality with no less a cause for polarization than was furnished during the 1960’s. It is waking up and flexing its muscles yet in another tumultuous time of tensions. For instance, religious extremism which used to be rare in the African continent has spread, especially after the recession, thus risking the stability of a continent that has just started to positively paint herself. And like the 'cold war' the former colonial powers are exploiting the tensions, as in the case in Mali, to further strengthen their presence as well as safeguard their interests in the continent.

Africa is not an island and what is happening elsewhere directly affects it. And often times, the effects come from the greedy hawks who mean exploitation and filling their pockets. A recently released report on oil and mining industry practices in Africa indicates the continent is suffering from secret deals whereby multinational corporations and elites in various countries cut the mass out of sharing the wealth. And the trends, except in a few countries, seem to be the same and not changing.

Adding fire to fuel is the other face of the development trend that some of the countries like Ethiopia, applauded for being on the rise, are taking growth as excuse for the carelessness to uphold human rights and free speech as stipulated in their own constitutions. In Ethiopia, for instance, the construction section is in a boom that buildings sprout like mushroom and roads spread in a blink. However, the country’s human rights record is one of the bleakest, according to Amnesty International. This is then the challenge, the Africa Rising mantra is facing: authoritarian governments, despite the economic muscle flexing in various sectors, could use the positive trend as license to impose human right abuses and even more.

So where is the worry? One might even ask that the mentioned challenges have been in Africa since independence and what makes them different now? The challenge for me is twofold. The first is the attraction of foreign investors who would like to take part in the positive development in the continent. This is not bad in itself, but inviting investors with no check and balance in place to guarantee the inclusion of the mass in sharing the profit made from the economic development, would only graven the burden of the mass. And such is the reality that would challenge the stability and security of the continent. As seen in many of the land grab trends in various counties in the continent, including Ethiopia, the frontline bearer of the harsh burden of huge infrastructure developments as well as evictions are the disfranchised mass. The people who are being taken out of their farms are not the elites in their palaces but the poor

Any development is both a challenge and opportunity according to the manner it is managed. Avoiding the pitfall of euphoria and creating a tide of galvanizing unity through leadership is required from AU.

The promise to lead the next half century with a vision focused on the people of the continent would bring a different and lasting success only if the means is changed. I say, the involvement of the people must be translated into the involvement of the children, who should be taught the truth about themselves and about the continent.

Reframing African renaissance

One of the new developments during the AU celebrations in May was the announcement of the African Vision 2063. The vision promised to be owned by the peoples of Africa at all of its stages. The strategic plan included priorities such as Growth and transformation, regional integration, peace and stability, gender equality and agriculture.

In line with this 'people led' Vision 2063, I believe that the AU should start to lead the continent into soul-searching. But what sort of soul searching do I mean? I mean a grassroots, committed and honest Pan-Africanism drive that could be spearheaded by the AU that depart from the gradualism and mediocrity of the past. A roaring lion kills no game.

Africa should not set her sail using the Western’s star and thus the experiences on which the designing of the vision should be based should come out of Africa. For the Vision to be, a vision of the mass, the tone of renaissance should be reframed with a take on the continent’s history. The AU should launch drive that commences from examining a metaphorical diorama of the experiences African nations that portray the dreams that the AU should live up to. As clearly inscribed in the AU anthem that goes:

“Let us all unite and toil together,
To give the best we have to Africa,
The cradle of mankind and fount of culture,

Our pride and hope at break of dawn,

The naive vision, I propose should have three chapters that represent our continents aspirations. The chapter should be named Ethiopia, Ghana and Congo respectively.

Chapter one Ethiopia:

If renaissance is rebirth, the rebirth that Africa seeks to have is an ‘Ethiopian’ reality. I don’t mean just the Ethiopian of today, but the metaphorical representation. Ethiopia was the name given to the continent in ancient times. AU should start the renaissance by reclaiming Ethiopia. I don’t mean a reality only of the current Ethiopia, but the Ethiopia of the ancient, the word that means African grace and greatness, Ethiopia representing the great African fortitude, civilization, and pride, religion and defiance.

What the present day Africa had and lost due to, the great misfortunes of human history, such as slavery and colonization, has left its hint in Ethiopia. Ethiopia is the only surviving African nation that exhibits to the world what colonization and slavery has done to the rest of Africa.

Chapter one Ghana:

Though the worst crime in human slavery perpetrated on the continent and prolonged dehumanizing colonization, Africa has risen. Despite being practically left with nothing to start herself as a continent Africa emulates Ghana as the phoenix the continent has become out of the ashes of subjugation. Through Ghana, (the first African country to come out of the colonial bondage) the continent can exhibit miraculous rise and readiness to compete in the community of nations after centuries of deprivation. Ghana represents the valor to venture on democracy and a system of government that the rest of the world took centuries to exercise.

Africa should have Ghana in the vision to say that despite the pitfall of coups that raged the rising freedom in the continent, Ghana has proved a rise is possible to put behind the false starts and make strides to development and progress. Africa could raise above all her problems. That is Ghana.

Chapter one Congo:

The Congo basin is the greatest challenges of any attempt at African Renaissance. Despite the great promises in the natural resources and the potential to change the face and fate of the continent, the Congo remains one of the great samples of inaction of the continent and of AU. The OAU as well as AU stand with incomplete project if not daringly solve the ongoing problem of the Congo not as a regional issue but an issue that the continent gives priority to. Like Nkrumah insisted the Congo is a strategic spot that determine the ultimate freedom of the continent. The misery and continuous cycle of war in the region should be restated and nakedly be seen as a mission to “decolonize the Congo from the blood mongering and highly connected multinationals.” As clearly put in the prophetic line of Franz Fanon who said “whoever controlled the Congo basin controls Africa”. But is Africa in control of the Congo basin?

Reframing the African Renaissance calls for the honesty on the basics, if renaissance is revival we should know what we are reviving and from where. A revival to be the masters of one own fates, owner of one’s own resources, arbiter of one’s own conflict and the designers of one’s own futures.